Nothing much should be read into these polls except that there may
have been a friendly dispute during the holiday period over the precise
rules. I don't guarantee to take any notice of the results. :-)
In Chrononauts
there are a few cards which can say `draw three cards, play two and
discard one' or something similar. Sometimes, though, when you have
your three cards you just don't want to play two of them (there might
not even be two cards which you can legally play, but that's another
story). So:
Yes - a discard is a valid play, and you can `kill time' too.
1(33.3%)
Yes, but killing time isn't valid because it requires you to
throw away a card that you should have played.
1(33.3%)
No - it tells you to play two cards and only says you can discard
one of them.
1(33.3%)
You should probably only answer this poll if you have played Chrononauts or if
you have read all the rules
and are reasonably confident you would know how to play.
One of our Christmas presents was a Mancala set. The
rules
aren't the ones that bopeepsheep is used to (as she has been playing
Meristones on Neopets) nor ones that I
had seen (my brother used to possess a game called `Wari' which is a variation
on this theme and was twinned with a tiddley-winks game, hence the name of the
pack: Wari-Winks); however, they seem to be the ones most widely found on the
web. You can also play online,
though this may influence your vote in this poll. . .
One of the rules states:
If your last piece lands in an empty hollow on your side of the board,
you empty the opposite hollow on your opponent's side of the board,
placing all those pieces and the piece that landed in the empty hollow
into your mancala.
I place the piece that landed in the empty hollow into my mancala
(together with the zero pieces in the opposite hollow).
3(60.0%)
Nothing further, since I didn't capture any pieces.
2(40.0%)
The precise details of `In One Word' are unimportant. Suffice to
say that you have to make your teammates say the word or phrase on the
card within a strict time limit*. In one instance of this I allowed the
other team to go a few seconds over the time limit to see whether they
would get it, as they seemed quite close and it was a shame to stop
them mid-flow (the precise thinking, or lack of same, behind this will
probably remain forever hidden in the inaccessible depths of my brain).
The facts are these:
The phrase on the card was `ice cream cone'.
The words `ice cream' were said before the timer expired
The word `cone' was said after the timer expired but before I stopped the
round (about 5-10 seconds later).
At no time were the words `ice cream cone' said consecutively.
If the team successfully conveys the word or phrase within
the time limit, they get the point; otherwise, the point automatically
goes to the opposing team.
They do, since it's my responsibility to say when the time is up
and I clearly failed in my duty.
1(20.0%)
No one - let's void it.
1(20.0%)
*In fact there are five words or phrases and you have to get all of them
within the time limit; moreover there's also a word limit, but these details
aren't relevant to the point under consideration.